Volume 5, Issue 4, December 2019, Page: 41-46
Comparative Study of Numerical Methods for Solving Non-linear Equations Using Manual Computation
Isaac Azure, Department of Computer Science, Regentropfen College of Applied Sciences, Bolgatanga, Ghana
Golbert Aloliga, Mathematics Department, St. Vincent College of Education, Yendi, Ghana
Louis Doabil, Business School, Ghana Institute of Management & Public Administration, Accra, Ghana
Received: Jun. 30, 2019;       Accepted: Dec. 25, 2019;       Published: Jan. 8, 2020
DOI: 10.11648/j.ml.20190504.11      View  341      Downloads  133
Abstract
This paper aims at comparing the performance in relation to the rate of convergence of five numerical methods namely, the Bisection method, Newton Raphson method, Regula Falsi method, Secant method, and Fixed Point Iteration method. A manual computational algorithm is developed for each of the methods and each one of them is employed to solve a root - finding problem manually with the help of an TI - inspire instrument. The outcome of the computations showed that all methods converged to an exact root of 1.56155, however the Bisection method converged at the 14th iteration, Fixed Point Iterative Method converged at 7th iteration, Secant method converged at the 5th iteration and Regula Falsi and Newton Raphson methods converged at the 2nd iteration, suggesting that Newton Raphson and Regula Falsi methods are more efficient in computing the roots of a nonlinear quadratic equation.
Keywords
Numerical Methods, Convergence, Root, Iteration, Manual Computation, Nonlinear Equations
To cite this article
Isaac Azure, Golbert Aloliga, Louis Doabil, Comparative Study of Numerical Methods for Solving Non-linear Equations Using Manual Computation, Mathematics Letters. Vol. 5, No. 4, 2019, pp. 41-46. doi: 10.11648/j.ml.20190504.11
Copyright
Copyright © 2019 Authors retain the copyright of this article.
This article is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
Reference
[1]
Abdul-Hassan, N. Y. (2016). New Predictor-Corrector Iterative Methods with Twelfth-Order Convergence for Solving Nonlinear Equations. American Journal of Applied Mathematics, 4 (4), 175-180.
[2]
Adegoke, T. M., Adegoke, G. K., Yahya, A. M., & Oduwole, H. K. (2018). Comparative Study of Some Numerical Iterations Using Zero Truncated Poisson Distribution. 1–30.
[3]
Ahmad, A. G. (2015). Comparative Study of Bisection and Newton-Rhapson Methods of Root-Finding Problems. International Journal of Mathematics Trends and Technology, 19 (2).
[4]
Biswa, N. D. (2012). Lecture Notes on Numerical Solution of Root − Finding Problems MATH 435.
[5]
Ebelechukwu, O. C., Johnson, B. O., Michael, A. I., & Fidelis, A. T. (2018). Comparison of Some Iterative Methods of Solving Nonlinear Equations. International Journal of Theoretical and Applied Mathematics, 4 (2), 22.
[6]
Ehiwario, J. C., & Aghamie, S. O. (2014). Comparative Study of Bisection, Newton-Raphson and Secant Methods of Root-Finding Problems. IOSR Journal of Engineering (IOSRJEN), 4 (04).
[7]
Gomes, A., & Morgado, J. (2013). A generalized regula falsi method for finding zeros and extrema of real functions. Mathematical Problems in Engineering, 2013.
[8]
Kumar, R. (2015). Comparative Analysis of Convergence of Various Numerical Methods. 6 (June), 290–297.
[9]
Moheuddin, M. M., Uddin, M. J., & Kowsher, M. A New STUDY TO FIND OUT THE BEST COMPUTATIONAL METHOD FOR SOLVING THE NONLINEAR EQUATION.
[10]
Steven, C. C and Raymond, P. C (2015). Numerical Methods for Engineers.
[11]
Srivastava, R. B., & Srivastava, S. (2011). Comparison of Numerical Rate of Convergence of Bisection, Newton-Raphson's and Secant Methods. Journal of Chemical, Biological and Physical Sciences (JCBPS), 2 (1), 472.
Browse journals by subject